E 'in a debate on the "manifesto" involving Asor, Sullo, Bevilacqua, Avenue, Scandurra, Berdini and many others on the " neo-environmentalism "which appears to shake the peninsula and the Committees on the phenomenon that we know well, having one of the promoters of the first hour of our members.
The writer and is much talk about the "new democratic and participatory" phenomenon of the Committees but without regard to a serious distortion resulting from two decades (in Veneto even fifty years ...) of delegation in white who proposes to treat "your interests" than the "common interests".
The real problem with committees is to succeed only in exceptional circumstances to move from "special" to the "General" from "my garden" of all the vegetable, that "everyone" usually there feel entitled to "plunder" why do not we.
We are just as eloquent and direct witnesses to the Association, where he became increasingly 'difficult to participate as a voluntary commitment and ideal.
We see membership and involvement, which usually depends on personal motivations and utilitarian, which is unlikely then become opportunities for engagement 'general.
Many feel that they have "powers", others believe that ours is a "work" that someone is charged and must meet performance criteria, the most 'evil' associations say they are the refuge of those who has no place in politics ...
The reality, poorly represented in part by our commitment and voluntary, however, is the willingness to defend the "common good" for the sole fact that they are valuable assets we are losing without even realizing it.
ourselves very often in danger of becoming "service agencies" for "customers" who have specific problems, but they become non-issues "relevant to whether someone else's property a bit more 'away from home!
AND 'logic alive and present, that we need not consider us to be blinded by so much "participation" for the various committees.
I was asked at a meeting where we discussed a new road, to include the request for intervention compensatory damages that result from the structure built on the road, but it becomes a "no harm", if it brings with it the classic change of use of agricultural land or extension of the existing airspace. Everything is relative ....
The logic is always that of "please", the "exchange" and "rights" but wondered unclaimed hat in hand to the powers that be, like Saviano explained happens in the south!
" If you do not trouble, you find me a solution" or "I support because I get a utility-specific", but I look up to see what my benefit is now part of a devastated land.
The situation is emblematic of our Veneto flooded and only the propaganda can 'have it depend on alleged cataclysm. L, but from our ongoing demolition of any sensible policy of urban development and protection of the territory, and when is built beside rivers, in the banks, without providing space for
the expansion of potential overflows, it is the fault of Jupiter Pluvio or well of others are the responsibility?
How waterproof are acres and acres of agricultural land, what could be done with a shower a little more 'abundant than usual, seeing action on the drains and canals are made for a maximum of "drain"?
The network of committees can ' serve only if he puts in the network real-life experiences and common knowledge to facilitate the various local committees.
do not need new statutes, new organization, nor the many speeches: just starting out in Article 9 of the Italian Constitution, however, is not going anywhere unless there is a growing awareness that only the personal commitment, voluntary , free for the "common good 'can gradually change the status of" disaster "that all percipi.
0 comments:
Post a Comment