The bill wants to change the LR No 67 8 of 2006 "Initiatives to support the production and use of woody biomass for energy purposes," which joins a line of European directives for the diversification of energy production.
It 's interesting to note that the production of "renewable energy", supported by European and state incentives, is getting a bargain and there are many attempts to support this trend with targets other than the primary purpose, but very useful, to approve Bills DEROGATION .
The report of the PDL 67, sponsored by Councilor Bond (James told by friends and enemies) and his associates, seems inspired by the support of energy policies and the protection of 'environment and are a practical planning tool regional energy and developing renewable energy sources.
Bond's concern is to encourage "the production and utilization of biomass produced by plants grown specifically for energy purposes (plantations for the production of woody biomass) or resulting from forest harvesting (woody material resulting from cultivation of abandoned or degraded forests). In practice Bond encourages the abandonment of the woods!
Regional Law No 8 of 2006 complements other initiatives to promote the production and use of woody biomass (in particular, measures 123 / F and 221 of the Rural Development Programme for 2007-13 Veneto; will be beneficial to see what they already prepared ...) and all together, along with the overall objectives of economic and environmental and aim at the consolidation of the wood-energy . The standard
fact acting simultaneously and synergistically (when I see the word synergy, I am suspicious ...) on three stages in the
- production, collection
- marketing
- processing, end use
However, the opportunities offered by regional law have so far not been fully grasped, because it seems complained of the lack of convenience by operators of the phase of collecting, storing and processing the product according to the further commercialization. Here are the "stakeholders" of James Bond! Operators are not convenience ... Poor ....
In particular, however, Boond's friends are mostly farmers who have large machinery and carry out various activities for farmers and do not know where to put their assets, although there are millions of cubic meters of industrial areas ... In fact, the report of the bill specifies that no modesty "Among these, in addition to agricultural and forestry enterprises engaged in forestry use on their own or anyone else, deserve attention the other parties operating activities agromechanical , referred to 'Article 5 of Legislative Decree no. March 29, 2004, No. 99 and the mprese commercial or industrial sector, owners of facilities processing or conditioning of woody biomass.
It seems (apparently?? Seems a pair of balls!) more binding that the limit is given in particular the inability to have
suitable surfaces for the storage of the product , including wood chips, in areas classified as agricultural , adjacent to the woods or close to places of work or use of biomass. Here's what you ask!
The alternative is to use currently in storage areas, mainly for industrial use with higher costs that make cross- treat the quoted material that is characterized by high-volume, low unit value, long lead time to allow storage
a cost reduction in the degree of humidity of wood materials. Ergo, since entrepreneurs agromechanical and do not earn enough wood processing is necessary for the agricultural land is further butchered to make yards with sheds for storage of wood or lawn areas of forest that will be more and more 'abandoned! furbissimo STRATEGY !
In particular, they use nature of forest-farm are typical processing companies (transport from the forest to the centers to use) and therefore require surfaces with a low level of infrastructure (pavement and roofs open), which store the wood materials. Think ... there is not to say that there will be increased job because you just need some huge yards and forklift to handle these platforms! Whether or not they are smart businessmen friends of Bond?
The purpose of ' Article 2 of this draft law is precisely to allow the construction of logistics platforms (similar to the agro-industrial settlements referred to in paragraph 7 of Article 44 of Law April 23, 2004 , n. The laying down rules on the government of the territory)
in areas classified as agricultural even by non-agricultural entrepreneurs who carry out their activities for the production of energy from biomass , notwithstanding to paragraphs 2 and 3 of 'Article 44 of the Regional Law 11 of 2004. The majority then says that it was made a planning law, but there are too many constraints and we must leave room for the hand of the market and then ... hey presto we have a beautiful waive that allows anyone to transform the agricultural areas in logistics platforms, then, when there will be no more 'the business of biomass, we say that the' run-down areas and transform them into areas for chissachecosa .. is not it?
Because farmers are not fools Bond Friends are also concerned to protect themselves from laws that might make it mandatory for entry for the "forest" that is their only way to make money and then care to specify that a forest is "non-forest" and that everything 'that is below the field (5000 m) has the characteristics of wood. In practice, so far I have the devastated plain wood to make a compound and now I am also a law to remove that residue.
Olmè's wood, if you reduce under the 5000 square meters, can 'be razed ?
same time, with Article 1, the bill seeks to give impetus to the pursuit of unmaggior other two objectives of the Regional Law 8 of 2006 represented by the recovery in production of lawns and pasture colonized by shrubs or trees and the related increase in the availability of woody material to be used for energy purposes (respectively d) and e), paragraph I, Article 1 of Regional Law No 8 of 2006).
To this end, the story of the original text introduces an 'integration of the definition of the areas to be considered a "non-forest' to allow easy use of wood biomass as a biofuel. The concern for the environment is clear: a " fire burning in the bowels of these entrepreneurs ...
The first of these changes is the possibility of using stains or wooded groves size of less than 5,000 meters square, made even apart from any public subsidy. Especially for the lowland areas, this should allow the increase of the realization on the part of owners of small extension of land, small areas of natural function, s ithout incurring constraints resulting from the legislative classification of "forest" , particularly with regard to any reversibility of use of land in what used.
The establishment of the so-called "bond Forest" in fact often acted as a deterrent from engaging in afforestation initiatives.
should be noted, however, that the threshold of 5,000 square feet is the minimum size to qualify as a forest area according to the FAO system, also adopted by the EU with Article 30 of Regulation No 1974/1986 (that I found a pretext to justify the crap that I'm proposing ...).
The second change introduces new criteria for the classification to "non-forest" of agricultural land afforested and forestry course for colonization of abandoned pastures or fields, allowing restore the original destinations by simple transaction medium, that is, through the
cutting of vegetation and the use of biomass for energy so obtained. It allows for the natural colonization process is in place by no less than 15 years and that the spontaneous forest vegetation has reached a 'less than 7 meters height.
The logic is always the same: I want to do what makes me money regardless of the environmental impacts and by keeping your hands free to go back to using public money to redo magare pastures, or who knows what else ... Ah, love for the land of the agro-industry is just great ...
Accurate first that the first council committee gave a favorable opinion by letter prot. No 18307 of 27 October 2010 by 40 votes in favor, none against and no abstention.
The Fourth Committee Board, responsible for the subject, began the process at its meeting on November 9
201, while the second committee has not been judged competent nonstante planning, derogation of the law.
The final text was approved by the Fourth Committee on November 23, 2010 and the counselor , Dario Bond first signer of the bill, has been shown to act as rapporteur of the measure in the House of others responsible for project legal advisers are Piergiorgio Cortelazzo, Leonardo Godfrey, David Bendinelli, Toniolo Costantino, Mauro Mainardi, Giancarlo Conta, badges Carlo Alberto.
0 comments:
Post a Comment